Moral distress and positive experiences of ICU staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic causes moral challenges and moral distress for healthcare professionals and, due to an increased work load, reduces time and opportunities for clinical ethics support services. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals could also identify essential elements to maintain or change in the future, as moral distress and moral challenges can indicate opportunities to strengthen moral resilience of healthcare professionals and organisations. This study describes 1) the experienced moral distress, challenges and ethical climate concerning end-of-life care of Intensive Care Unit staff during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and 2) their positive experiences and lessons learned, which function as directions for future forms of ethics support. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey combining quantitative and qualitative elements was sent to all healthcare professionals who worked at the Intensive Care Unit of the Amsterdam UMC - Location AMC during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey consisted of 36 items about moral distress (concerning quality of care and emotional stress), team cooperation, ethical climate and (ways of dealing with) end-of-life decisions, and two open questions about positive experiences and suggestions for work improvement. RESULTS: All 178 respondents (response rate: 25-32%) showed signs of moral distress, and experienced moral dilemmas in end-of-life decisions, whereas they experienced a relatively positive ethical climate. Nurses scored significantly higher than physicians on most items. Positive experiences were mostly related to 'team cooperation', 'team solidarity' and 'work ethic'. Lessons learned were mostly related to 'quality of care' and 'professional qualities'. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the crisis, positive experiences related to ethical climate, team members and overall work ethic were reported by Intensive Care Unit staff and quality and organisation of care lessons were learned. Ethics support services can be tailored to reflect on morally challenging situations, restore moral resilience, create space for self-care and strengthen team spirit. This can improve healthcare professionals' dealing of inherent moral challenges and moral distress in order to strengthen both individual and organisational moral resilience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on The Netherlands Trial Register, number NL9177.

Development of a data-driven digital phenotype profile of distress experience of healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Due to the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers have reported acting in ways that are contrary to their moral values, and this may result in moral distress. This paper proposes the novel digital phenotype profile (DPP) tool, developed specifically to evaluate stress experiences within participants. The DPP tool was evaluated using the COVID-19 VR Healthcare Simulation of Stress Experience (HSSE) dataset (NCT05001542), which is composed of passive physiological signals and active mental health questionnaires. The DPP tool focuses on correlating electrocardiogram, respiration, photoplethysmography, and galvanic skin response with moral injury outcome scale (Brief MIOS). METHODS: Data-driven techniques are encompassed to develop a tool for robust evaluation of distress among participants. To accomplish this, we applied pre-processing techniques which involved normalization, data sanitation, segmentation, and windowing. During feature analysis, we extracted domain-specific features, followed by feature selection techniques to rank the importance of the feature set. Prior to classification, we employed k-means clustering to group the Brief MIOS scores to low, moderate, and high moral distress as the Brief MIOS lacks established severity cut-off scores. Support vector machine and decision tree models were used to create machine learning models to predict moral distress severities. RESULTS: Weighted support vector machine with leave-one-subject-out-cross-validation evaluated the separation of the Brief MIOS scores and achieved an average accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and F1 of 98.67%, 98.83%, 99.44%, and 99.13%, respectively. Various machine learning ablation tests were performed to support our results and further enhance the understanding of the predictive model. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility to develop a DPP tool to predict distress experiences using a combination of mental health questionnaires and passive signals. The DPP tool is the first of its kind developed from the analysis of the HSSE dataset. Additional validation is needed for the DPP tool through replication in larger sample sizes.

Moral failure, moral prudence, and character challenges in residential care during the Covid-19 pandemic.

In many high-income countries, an initial response to the severe impact of Covid-19 on residential care was to shield residents from outside contacts. As the pandemic progressed, these measures have been increasingly questioned, given their detrimental impact on residents' health and well-being and their dubious effectiveness. Many authorities have been hesitant in adapting visiting policies, often leaving nursing homes to act on their own safety and liability considerations. Against this backdrop, this article discusses the appropriateness of viewing the continuation of the practice of shielding as a moral failure. This is affirmed and specified in four dimensions: preventability of foreseeable harm, moral agency, moral character, and moral practice (in MacIntyre's sense). Moral character is discussed in the context of prudent versus proportionate choices. As to moral practice, it will be shown that the continued practice of shielding no longer met the requirements of an (inherently moral) practice, as external goods such as security thinking and structural deficiencies prevented the pursuit of internal goods focusing on residents' interests and welfare, which in many places has led to a loss of trust in these facilities. This specification of moral failure also allows a novel perspective on moral distress, which can be understood as the expression of the psychological impact of moral failure on moral agents. Conclusions are formulated about how pandemic events can be understood as character challenges for healthcare professionals within residential care, aimed at preserving the internal goods of residential care even under difficult circumstances, which is understood as a manifestation of moral resilience. Finally, the importance of moral and civic education of healthcare students is emphasized to facilitate students' early identification as trusted members of a profession and a caring society, in order to reduce experiences of moral failure or improve the way to deal with it effectively.

Examining moral injury in clinical practice: A narrative literature review.

Healthcare workers experience moral injury (MI), a violation of their moral code due to circumstances beyond their control. MI threatens the healthcare workforce in all settings and leads to medical errors, depression/anxiety, and personal and occupational dysfunction, significantly affecting job satisfaction and retention. This article aims to differentiate concepts and define causes surrounding MI in healthcare. A narrative literature review was performed using SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PubMed for peer-reviewed journal articles published in English between 2017 and 2023. Search terms included "moral injury" and "moral distress," identifying 249 records. While individual risk factors predispose healthcare workers to MI, root causes stem from healthcare systems. Accumulation of moral stressors and potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) (from administrative burden, institutional betrayal, lack of autonomy, corporatization of healthcare, and inadequate resources) result in MI. Individuals with MI develop moral resilience or residue, leading to burnout, job abandonment, and post-traumatic stress. Healthcare institutions should focus on administrative and climate interventions to prevent and address MI. Management should ensure autonomy, provide tangible support, reduce administrative burden, advocate for diversity of clinical healthcare roles in positions of interdisciplinary leadership, and communicate effectively. Strategies also exist for individuals to increase moral resilience, reducing the impact of moral stressors and PMIEs.

"I Don't Want to Go to Work": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Healthcare Worker Experiences from the Front- and Side-Lines of COVID-19.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCW) were categorized as "essential" and "non-essential", creating a division where some were "locked-in" a system with little ability to prepare for or control the oncoming crisis. Others were "locked-out" regardless of whether their skills might be useful. The purpose of this study was to systematically gather data over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic from HCW through an interprofessional lens to examine experiences of locked-out HCW. This convergent parallel mixed-methods study captured perspectives representing nearly two dozen professions through a survey, administered via social media, and video blogs. Analysis included logistic regression models of differences in outcome measures by professional category and Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio recordings (RITA) of video blogs. We collected 1299 baseline responses from 15 April 2020 to 16 March 2021. Of those responses, 12.1% reported no signs of burnout, while 21.9% reported four or more signs. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) professional identity, (2) intrinsic stressors, (3) extrinsic factors, and (4) coping strategies. There are some differences in the experiences of locked-in and locked-out HCW. This did not always lead to differing reports of moral distress and burnout, and both groups struggled to cope with the realities of the pandemic.

All the King's Horses and All the King's Men: Falling Into Moral Injury, During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Health care providers who experienced giving care or abbreviating those services, during the COVID-19 pandemic, risked experiencing a sense of moral injury. Moral injury is a term to describe incidents where a health care provider knows the right thing to do, but constraints make it exceedingly difficult or impossible to execute the right course of action. These incidents likely also were present for sonographers and vascular technologists, and it is vital that these compromises for patients are recognized, and healing strategies offered to those suffering from moral injury. Some suggestions for treatment of moral injury are to recognize these experiences, seek solutions, provide empathy for patients and resources for health care providers. It may also be beneficial to allow employees and employers to forgive the mistakes made during the pandemic and focus on solutions to prevent future incidents of moral injury.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

Moving From Moral Distress to Moral Resilience Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Moral distress (MD) is a problematic experience for healthcare workers, with career engagement implications includ-ing burnout, job turnover, and career turnover. Instances of MD have been increasing since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, threatening greater problems for the healthcare system. Although a range of interventions have been explored, no evidence-based treatment has been identified. Be-cause of how embedded ethical decision-making is in the health-care field, it is unlikely that MD will be eradicated;however, it is suggested that MD can be learned from and transformed into moral resilience. Some evidence indi-cates that healthcare workers could benefit from mindfulness-based and emotion regulation skills, alongside values-based and action strategies, to support the devel-opment of moral resilience. This article proposes the applicability of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and its six core skills-acceptance, cognitive de -fusion, mindfulness, self-as -con-text, values, and commitment-to the work of career practitioners as a means of developing moral resilience skills among healthcare workers.

Moral Distress, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction in Emergency Medical Technicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) or paramedics may not be able to do according to their moral standards during the COVID-19 pandemic, which can cause burnout and job dissatisfaction. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate moral distress (MD), job satisfaction, and burnout among EMTs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Bam, Iran in 2020. In total, 134 EMTs completed the online survey that included demographic information, a MD scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and an item for assessing job satisfaction. Descriptive statistics along with independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, as well as multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze data. Results: The mean scores of MD and job satisfaction were 25.44 +/- 12.78 and 3.63 +/- 1.07, respectively. Concerning severity, the mean scores of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) were 35.45 +/- 5.04, 20.61 +/- 3.40, and 33.04 +/- 4.07, respectively. All three burnout subscales were significantly correlated with job satisfaction (P < 0.05) and MD (P < 0.05). Access to personal protective equipment and education level significantly predicted MD (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Despite high burnout and moderate MD, EMTs reported high job satisfaction, possibly because of increased social respect and salary. EMTs can avoid MD and burnout by learning how to handle ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Exploring experiences of moral injury and distress among health care workers during the Covid-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Health care workers have been exposed to a variety of practical and emotional challenges because of the Covid-19 pandemic, leaving them vulnerable to experiencing moral injury and distress. However, there is currently sparse research which directly explores such experiences. This study aimed to explore and characterise the experiences and impacts of moral injury and distress among health care workers during the pandemic. METHODS: Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care workers employed across both mental and physical health care services. Interviews were analysed from a critical realist perspective using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified: attitudes towards moral injury, experiences of moral injury and consequences of moral injury. Participants appeared to identify with the idea of acting against their morals to varying extents based on their job roles. Participants experienced a range of potentially morally injurious and distressing events throughout the pandemic and many ultimately felt that they provided sub-standard levels of care due to extreme pressures on services. Detrimental impacts upon wellbeing were commonly reported, including high levels of emotional distress and feelings of guilt and shame. Some reported a loss of enthusiasm for their job and a desire to leave the profession entirely. CONCLUSION: Moral injury and distress presents a real concern for staff wellbeing and retention within the profession. During and beyond the Covid-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need for health care providers to implement wider strategies to target moral injury and distress, and support staff within health care settings.

Healthcare Providers' Experiences of Caring for Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) affected healthcare workers (HCW) in ways more than increasing the volume of patients needing care. Increased numbers of patients at younger ages required support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Providing this care requires an interdisciplinary team. AIM: This study explored the experiences of HCW caring for patients with COVID-19 on ECMO. METHODS: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconferencing, and transcript comparison was used for the analysis. FINDINGS: Open coding of the data generated 7 categories including (1) fearing the unknown, (2) confronting challenges in patient and/or family interactions, (3) encountering barriers to providing care, (4) facing moral distress, (5) working through exhaustion, (6) persevering by strengthening teamwork, (7) and acknowledging frustration with non-believers. DISCUSSION: HCW balanced pessimism and optimism while caring for patient with COVID-19 on ECMO. They used negative experiences caring for these patients to strength teamwork and bonding among peers. CONCLUSION: The practice implications for caring for patients with COVID-19 on ECMO include viligance by clinician and organization to protect the wellbeing of healthcare providers, particularly in ICU and ECMO units were moral distress and burnout can be high.

The emotional and moral remnants of COVID-19: Burnout, moral distress, and mental health concerns

Nursing during a pandemic like COVID-19 is challenging, because of pervasive uncertainty, fear, lack of knowledge about the virus and its manifestations, and caring for complicated patients without adequate personal protective equipment and other needed resources. Many suffer from moral distress as a result of their inability to do what they think is right for their patients. Herein is a description of moral distress during COVID, what causes it, and what can be done to promote the mental, physical, and moral well-being of invaluable nurses. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. All rights reserved.

Dying in isolation

Palliative care is a nursing and medical specialty focused on providing comfort to those with chronic, life-limiting illness from diagnosis to the end of life through symptom management, aligning goals of care, and providing psychosocial/spiritual support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, millions experienced new, rapid symptoms and many faced untimely deaths. As experts in end-of-life care, palliative care clinicians played a vital role in pandemic care. Yet, the delivery of palliative care required significant adjustments due to visitor restrictions and isolation precautions. These changes included, but are not limited to, communication styles, involvement of family in symptom management, and adoption of telehealth. Throughout pandemic care, palliative care clinicians were also helping patients, families, and clinicians navigate a multitude of ethical decisions, including supporting frontline healthcare workers. This chapter focuses on palliative and end-of-life issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. All rights reserved.

'Against everything that got you into the job': experiences of potentially morally injurious events among Canadian public safety personnel.

Background: Moral injury (MI) has become a research and organizational priority as frontline personnel have, both during and in the years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, raised concerns about repeated expectations to make choices that transgress their deeply held morals, values, and beliefs. As awareness of MI grows, so, too, does attention on its presence and impacts in related occupations such as those in public safety, given that codes of conduct, morally and ethically complex decisions, and high-stakes situations are inherent features of such occupations.Objective: This paper shares the results of a study of the presence of potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) in the lived experiences of 38 public safety personnel (PSP) in Ontario, Canada.Method: Through qualitative interviews, this study explored the types of events PSP identify as PMIEs, how PSP make sense of these events, and the psychological, professional, and interpersonal impacts of these events. Thematic analysis supported the interpretation of PSP descriptions of events and experiences.Results: PMIEs do arise in the context of PSP work, namely during the performance of role-specific responsibilities, within the organizational climate, and because of inadequacies in the broader healthcare system. PMIEs are as such because they violate core beliefs commonly held by PSP and compromise their ability to act in accordance with the principles that motivate them in their work. PSP associate PMIEs, in combination with traumatic experiences and routine stress, with adverse psychological, professional and personal outcomes.Conclusion: The findings provide additional empirical evidence to the growing literature on MI in PSP, offering insight into the contextual dimensions that contribute to the sources and effects of PMIEs in diverse frontline populations as well as support for the continued application and exploration of MI in the PSP context.

The objective of this study was to understand the types of events that Canadian public safety personnel (PSP) experience as potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) as well as the impacts that they associate with these events.The findings illuminate that contextual dimensions are significant in the origin of PMIEs, which PSP experience in the completion of routine duties, because of the organizational culture, or as a result of issues in the broader healthcare system, which led to many negative consequences in their personal and professional lives.PMIEs reduced the trust PSP had in their leadership and the healthcare system to protect the public and themselves, were associated with feelings of anger, frustration, resignation, and helplessness, and connected to internal struggles marked by inner conflict and the erosion of self-concept.

Spanish psychometric properties of the moral distress scale-revised: a study in healthcare professionals treating COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Moral distress appears when a healthcare professional is not able to carry out actions in accordance with their professional ethical standards. The Moral Distress Scale-Revised is the most widely used to assess levels of moral distress, but it is not validated in Spanish. The aim of the study is to validate the Spanish version of the Moral Distress Scale - utilised within a sample of Spanish healthcare professionals treating COVID-19 patients. METHODS: The original (english) and the portuguese and french versions of the scale were translated into spanish by native or bilingual researchers and reviewed by an academic expert in ethics and moral philosophy as well as by a clinical expert. RESEARCH DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study carried out using a self-reporting online survey. The data was collected between June- November 2020. A total of 661 professionals responded to the survey (N = 2873). PARTICIPANTS: healthcare professionals with more than two weeks of experience treating COVID-19 patients at the end of their life and working in the public sector of the Balearic Islands Health Service (Spain). Analyses included descriptive statistics, competitive confirmatory factor analysis, evidence on criterion-related validity and estimates of reliability. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Balearic Islands. RESULTS: An unidimensional model in which a general factor of moral distress explained by 11 items of the Spanish version of the MDS-R scale was an adequate representation of the data: χ2(44) = 113.492 (p 0.001); Comparative Fit Index = 0.965; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.079[0.062,0.097]; and Standarized Root Mean-Square = 0.037. Evidence of reliability was excellent: Cronbach's alpha = 0.886 and McDonald's omega = 0.910. Moral distress was related to discipline, with nurses having statistically significant higher levels than physicians. Additionally, moral distress successfully predicted professional quality of life, with higher levels of moral distress being related to poorer quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of Moral Distress Scale-Revised can be used as a reliable and valid measurement tool for the evaluation of moral distress experienced by health professionals. This tool will be highly useful for managers and applicable to a variety of healthcare professionals and settings.

Students' experiences of moral challenges in clinical placement during the covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

Background: Care in a crisis, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, might entail moral challenges for nursing students. Aim: The aim of this study was to gain knowledge of nursing students' experiences of moral challenges arising when caring for patients in clinical placement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study has a qualitative design with individual interviews of nine nursing students. Data were analysed using the six-step model of thematic analysis. Findings: The students' experienced moral challenges when caring for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Three themes were defined: The double fear of infection, mixed feelings of being a "hero" and an "over-worked pushover" and compromising on basic knowledge and values. Conclusion: The findings described the students' experiences of morally challenging situations that arose when caring for patients during COVID-19 pandemic. The students were drawn between feelings of being appreciated and needed and feelings of being powerless.

"Sip & Share": Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds.

OBJECTIVE: Resident moral distress rounds were instituted during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a safe zone for discussion, reflection, and the identification of the ethical challenges contributing to moral distress. The sessions, entitled "Sip & Share," also served to foster connectedness and build resilience. DESIGN: A baseline needs assessment was performed and only 36% of general surgery residents in the program were satisfied with the current non-technical skills curriculum. Only 62% were comfortable with navigating ethical issues in surgery. About 72% were comfortable with leading a goals-of-care discussion, and 63% of residents were comfortable with offering surgical palliative care options. Case-based discussions over video conferencing were organized monthly. Each session was structured based on the eight-step methodology described by Morley and Shashidhara. Participation was voluntary. The sessions explored moral distress, and the ethical tensions between patient autonomy and beneficence, and beneficence and non-maleficence. SETTING: Large general surgery residency in an urban tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents. RESULTS: A post-intervention survey was performed with improvement in the satisfaction with the non-technical skills curriculum (70% from 36%). The proportion of residents feeling comfortable with navigating ethical issues in surgery increased from 62% to 72%. A survey was performed to assess the efficacy of the moral distress rounds after eight Sip & Share sessions over ten months. All thirteen respondents agreed that the discussions provided them with the vocabulary to discuss ethical dilemmas and define the ethical principles contributing to their moral distress. 93% were able to apply the templates learned to their practice, 77% felt that the discussions helped mitigate stress. All respondents recommended attending the sessions to other residents. CONCLUSIONS: Moral distress rounds provide a structured safe zone for residents to share and process morally distressing experiences. These gatherings mitigate isolation, promote a sense of community, and provide a support network within the residency. In addition, residents are equipped with the vocabulary to identify the ethical principles being challenged and are provided practical take-aways to avoid similar conflicts in the future.

Critical Care Providers' Moral Distress: Frequency, Burden, and Potential Resources.

BACKGROUND: Critical Care Providers (CCPs) experience situations that challenge their ethics and professional standards and may entail moral distress (MD). AIM: To analyze MD perceived by CCPs in intensive care units (ICUs) or emergency departments (EDs) and further clarify whether CCPs who rely on spiritual resources differ in their perception of MD from those who do not utilize these resources. METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was administered using a modified version of the German language version of the Moral Distress Scale (MDS) with 2 × 12 items to assess the frequency and the respective perceived burden of specific situations by applying a 5-point Likert scale. Explorative factor analysis was performed and the sub-constructs of the respective items regarding MD frequency and burden were identified. Job burden and professional satisfaction were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) and a four-point Likert scale, respectively. The 15-item SpREUK questionnaire was applied to measure spiritual attitudes and behaviours and to differentiate between religious and spiritual persons. Data from 385 German-speaking CCPs were included (55% physicians, 45% nurses). RESULTS: Conflict situations are similar for physicians and nurses although they are perceived as more burdensome by nurses. Among physicians, the MDS factor Looking away/Resignation scores highest for assistant physician residents, whereas distress caused by looking away is more often perceived by specialist physicians without a managerial position. Work satisfaction is inversely associated with MD and emotional exhaustion is positively associated with it. Participants' spirituality is marginally associated with MD. The best predictors of both MD frequency and burden are emotional exhaustion with further influences of work satisfaction, being a nurse, and being a non-believer on the frequency of MD perception. Being a nurse, participants' experience in ICU/ED, and being of the male gender are further predictors of MD burden. CONCLUSIONS: MD is experienced differently by different groups of CCPs depending on their place in the hierarchy of responsibility. As MD perception is best predicted by emotional exhaustion, these situations should be avoided. Although some CCPs may rely on spiritual resources, all need individual and team support to cope with MD.

A qualitative study of moral distress in physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic

The spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) created a pandemic and had a world-shattering effect on healthcare organizations. As a result, many healthcare professionals were exposed to health situations that stretched them beyond their professional ethics, mental health, and emotional capacity. Throughout the last 30 years, moral distress has been understood as the type of stress that medical professionals experience. Research has substantially grown regarding COVID-19 and moral distress, exposing gaps in the ability of experts to care as they should. Moral distress was a term created to define the emotional disruption that occurs when a professional cannot work within their ethical duty due to organizational or policy constrictions but know the needed moral action. The purpose of this generic qualitative study was to understand eight physicians' perceptions of moral distress during the pandemic. Jameton's concept of moral distress was the framework for understanding physicians' perceptions. The generic qualitative approach explored physicians' treatment during the pandemic for this study. Interviews were conducted using semi-structured interview questions via videoconferencing (Google Meet). Braun and Clark's thematic six-step analysis was used to analyze and code the data. The results of the eight semi-structured interviews demonstrated that moral distress was a cyclic effect. Four themes that emerged as a result of understanding the perception of moral distress during the pandemic included that the system was reactive, causing maladaptive behaviors. The research explored physicians' perceptions while promoting positive social change by improving self-awareness to educate pandemic-related barriers or constraints professionally faced daily. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Moral Distress Amongst District Leaders: Intensity, Dilemmas, and Coping Mechanisms in the Context of Covid-19

Purpose: This study examines the sources and intensity of moral distress among school district leaders during the first full school year of the Covid-19 pandemic and investigates their coping mechanisms for addressing issues that create moral dilemmas for them. Design and Evidence: We draw on semi-structured interviews with 26 school district leaders across 13 school districts in the Northwestern United States. Brief summaries detailing themes in each interview were prepared. Magnitude coding was used to understand the intensity of district leaders' feelings of distress. Open coding and axial coding allowed us to categorize the origins/sources of distress and the approaches/strategies district leaders used to reduce feelings of moral distress. Findings: Reported moral distress ranged from none to moderate but manageable amounts. Three types of problems were described as morally distressing: political problems with the community or unions, staff problems including staff stress, staff resistance, and collaboration amongst staff members, and an inability to meet student needs due to resource, policy, or community/family constraints. Leaders' coping mechanisms included social responses such as team building, but also drew on individual virtues such as persistence and patience. Implications: Within the ranks of district leaders, the extent to which leaders frame their challenges in a moral frame is varied. A sizable group articulated challenges with implications for moral action in primarily technical or political terms. If district leaders engage unevenly with the moral tradeoffs of their decisions, they risk adopting an overly managerialist frame. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Educational Administration Quarterly is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Correlation between moral distress and clinical competence in COVID-19 ICU nurses.

BACKGROUND: Nurses' clinical competence is one of the fundamental necessities for providing safe and effective care. Moral distress, as one type of occupational stressors, can affect various aspects of clinical competence, especially under conditions of complicated medical settings such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. This study was conducted with the aim of determining the relationship between moral distress and clinical competence in nurses working in COVID-19 intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional study. A total of 194 nurses working in COVID-19 ICU affiliated to Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, central Iran, participated in the study. Data were collected using Demographic Information Questionnaire, Moral Distress Scale, and Clinical Competence Checklist. Data were analyzed with SPSS20 using descriptive and analytical statistics. RESULTS: The mean score of moral distress, clinical competence, and skills application were 1.79 ± 0/68, 65.16 ± 15.38, and 145.10 ± 38.20, respectively. Based on Pearson correlation coefficient, there was an inverse and significant relationship between the moral distress score and its dimensions with clinical competence and skills application (P < 0.001). Moral distress was a significant negative predictor that accounted for 17.9% of the variance in clinical competence (R2 = 0.179, P < 0.001) and 16% of the variance in utilization of clinical competence (R2 = 0.160, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering the relationship between moral distress, clinical competence and skills application, to maintain the quality of nursing services, nursing managers can strengthen clinical competence and skills application by using strategies to deal with and reduce moral distress in nurses, especially in critical situations.